batalion666 (October 6, 2008 at 3:39 pm)

i like Oswald as a figure as victim as martyr

grassyknollkiller (August 21, 2008 at 6:20 pm)

Kenneth O'Donnell, SS, Follow-up Car, WC deposition, May 18, 1964, 7H4481964 KO:"My reaction in part is reconstruction - is the shots came from the right rear."MAN of the HOUSE, by Tip O'Neill, Random House: 1987, pg1781987 KO:"I told the FBI I heard two shots from behind the fence but they said it couldn't have happened that way and that I must have been imagining things. So I testified the way they wanted me to. I just didn't want to stir up any more pain and trouble for the family."

selatik1 (July 2, 2008 at 11:42 am)

Zaharoula: Robert Stone's film was designed 2 cloud & dismiss the involvement of the CIA, FBI, etc in JFK's murder. He's using the Machiavellian technique APPEARing 2 b unbiased & seriously questioning authority, & after an "exhaustive, fair investigation" the conclusion is made that, lo, the government was right all along! The real intent of "documentaries" like these is 2 get the actual sponsors of the murder out of the spotlight & drive home further the big lie that the government is right.

selatik1 (July 2, 2008 at 11:16 am)

Sadly, they'll keep cranking out articles, books & films 2 deliberatly mislead & confuse people about the JFK murder & discredit those close 2 the truth. Garrison & Oliver(NOT Robert!) Stone got close & were attacked by the media. It's wrong 2 reflexively dismiss everything as silly "conspiracy theories". Yeah there's a lot of B.S. out there, & u can't believe it all. But people in positions of power DO plan future events for their own immoral gain, which is the definition of conspiracy.

selatik1 (July 2, 2008 at 10:57 am)

I mean, come on--Robert STONE? Was this someone's clever idea 2 make it appear that Robert Stone's aligned with/related 2 Oliver Stone, who made "JFK"? How 'bout . . . 'NO?' Then there's "Oswald's Ghost"'s MySpace page, which looks "fabricated". A great deal of effort is made 2 align this film & its director with Oliver Stone & "JFK"-a bit too much lock-step, don't you think? The abundance of formulaic "nutty" comments left by "conspiracy theorists" merits a bit of suspicion as well.

selatik1 (July 2, 2008 at 10:23 am)

This film is a piece of propaganda if I ever saw one. I don't buy it. It is yet another skillful attempt to "muddy the water" & diffuse attention on the CIA's & the miltary-industrial complex's (war machine) involvement in JFK's murder. It's all here, the discrediting of Jim Garrison, trotting out of the big-names, enumerating the "false sponsors"--groups the CIA-types set up to appear to have been at the heart of the operation. The Soviets, The Mob, Cuba, Texas Oil Barons--ALL false sponsors.

themeaningoflife38 (May 2, 2008 at 8:04 pm)

CIA LBJ Chord Meyer Howard Hunt all guilty

LeeHarveyOswald63 (March 8, 2008 at 2:23 am)

Look You unmotivated ciphers, One Man can make a difference. Just ask Jack Ruby.

Bentherdonthat (February 29, 2008 at 9:51 pm)

the assassin and oswald where both on national and international tv twice that night of the dallas frog shoot why dosent any one comment on that?

xxZaharoulaxx (February 22, 2008 at 4:19 am)

Stone has made a fool of himself. The man believes in a conspiracy but also believes in LHO's guilt.