zaohad1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Funny eh? that logical side of the brain not working really stands out a mile away, but the other one doesnt stand out at all. they are all tax inspectors ,lawyers, accountants etc and appear normal.

zaohad1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He felt like a total phoney about this film and comiited siucide by driving much too fast on a bend in road. Theres strong evidence he didnt want to die but wanted to up the ante in his outrageous drunken behaviour/. This time he didnt get away with it. his car left the road with 2 female passengers hit a tree and catapulted him out. He came to a stop when he hit a tree trunk dead on while flying through the airOne passenger killed one survived.

zaohad1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He always did whatever he thought right and was a pretty much tortured individual by his hopes and fears. His mind was unable to do really simple things like talk fluently make logical sense of things etc which tells me his other side of the brain, the creative side was really totally in control.I dont admire him as a man ,he was a total drunk and nasty to people, but I admire him as an artist.

DemetriusAthena (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I just started painting again after 30 years of being a photographer, and I agree with Jackson I love painting on the floor, this was a fantastic short film that I've never seen.

MrWowforever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

go to james kalm here on youtube...he has about 220 shows for you too maybe find someone you like.......i'd be curious if any of it is for you:)

VapidVance (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

pollock!The Vances,beautifulanarchy(dot)wordpress(dot)com

AuroraAbstract (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Still great!!

datafork (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

your getting caught up in semantics. the point of my original comment is clear. i'm not going to argue a proven fact with someone that has no knowledge of the subject, and obviously horrible tastes in art. i'm not going to reply to anymore of confused rants.

stodoraddy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

And I will research this.

stodoraddy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It is one thing to assert, as you did in a previous post, that the CIA paid (or, if you prefer, commissioned) Pollock to paint as he did, and quite another to say that, unbeknownst to the artist, his art was "secretly promoted." You said previously, "He was commissioned by the CIA to paint this way," and I took you at your word, which made it sound as if Pollock's style was originated by the CIA---which, of course, would make Pollock a total fraud.